relationship advice for men

Relationships like raising children are best when both share the same view
Relationships like raising children are best when both share the same view

I seldom agree with Dear Abby,  and this is again one of those occasions that I definitely don’t agree. Women who dispense advice tend to try to smooth over family relationships, bind difficult people to the community standards (theirs) and ignore the obvious. Today was just one of those occasions.

Dear Abby was taking to task a father who was pointedly  and ‘cruelly’ warning his wife that their son could very easily take after HER brother and fall into a tragic life. To be fair, neither Dear Abby , nor I, have all the facts… but I think I can sort through the ambiguity and make a guess as to what is really going on.

Relationships, like child rearing, are best done by parents who agree on virtually everything. Science is showing that the more similar a couple is … the greater their chance of compatibility and sustainability.  Similar personalities is — to me — clearly one of the key factors to mutual happiness. How we view the world, our individual beliefs, our personal values and our unique political perspectives , when similar, can in a relationship help facilitate a lasting bond of love and friendship…. and as those core values, beliefs and perspectives become disparate, then it can be a recipe for disaster for both the relationship and in trying to raise successful and happy children.

Let me guess about Dear Abby’s couple. The man is probably what we might consider traditional … while the mother is permissive with a ‘hands off’ child rearing philosophy. She probably advocates : 1) that the child explore the world with no discipline or consequences, 2) using words instead of fists, 3) experimenting and gaining friendships with a wide range of interesting people and 4)  undertaking activities with the minimum of supervision or structure. Let’s just say, he feels quite differently. The mother was probably also  raised in a fairly unstructured and  permissive environment, which may explain why her brother likely had the opportunity to discover a troubling path through new and interesting friends.

I do have some sympathy for the mother, she probably really doesn’t understand what is wrong. She is raising her child as her mother raised her… and her brother. Since both she and her brother turned out differently, she is more likely to attribute the difference to ‘luck.’  Therefore, if a child turns out ‘well’ , it is merely chance or luck… but, she is sadly wrong. It goes with out saying, if you allow the village to raise your child, don’t be surprised to end up with the village idiot. Because, it is the involvement of parents that makes all the difference in the outcomes of children…  even though the journey can be fraught with many more challenges than the permissive parent…  it is the positive outcome for our children — after all — that we are striving.

So, my dear traditional male friends, my advice is to find someone just like you, someone who shares your values… if you do, you will have a better chance to be happy and  proud of how your children grow to become fine adults. Remember , my friends, bimbos seldom make happy relationships or good mothers.

Roger Freberg

what is making America fatter? you may be surprised

one will probably make you fatter faster!
one will probably make you fatter faster!

Do you ever wonder why you eat the same things as you have always eaten, but somehow you are getting fatter? At first you might be thinking,”I am getting older and the old metabolism is slowing down, so the calories are just sticking around.” Although this may be true to some point, the latest research points to something that may be far more disturbing.

Interestingly enough, if you compare when America started going into the ‘plus sizes’ and the advent of high fructose corn syrup becoming universally accepted in the food industry, there is a correlation. Although correlations do not prove causality, this is far and away an ‘early warning sign’ that can’t be ignored. Check your pantry and see what doesn’t have HFCS in it and you will be surprised! It was even in my prized RICE KRISPIES!

Laura wrote a post a while ago with a link to a site that demonstrates that in two sets of animals given identical calorie diets, those fed high fructose corn syrup got obese and those with plain sugar did not. Here’s part of Laura’s enlightening blog:

American Like Their SweetsAmerican Like Their Sweets

In 2005, the average American consumed nearly 30 kg (66 pounds) of HFCS, as corn is heavily subsidized by the federal government, making corn products unusually cheap. In addition to being suspected of  contributing to America’s obesity epidemicproducts containing HFCS also have high levels of reactive carbonyls not found in table sugar. Carbonyls have been implicated in tissue damage, such as nerve damage and foot ulcers, in diabetes.

Thank you , Laura… as someone struggling with diabetes and ‘drug free’… staying away from HFCS is more than a choice, it is a necessity.

Fortunately food marketers are starting to get the message, in part, and as the comparison between two popular maple syrups attests… one contains HFCS and the other does not. Guess which one I am buying now and they were both on my shelf!

Good luck and good dieting to all! Oh yeah, let me plug  Jenny Craig... it worked for me!

Roger Freberg

what have they done to my rice krispies?

RiceKrispies

I am not a health nut… I enjoy butter, cane sugar, prefer cream in my coffee and I enjoy cooking yummy things designed to bring a smile. However, on occasion, I use a few already prepared products as a short cut and I was astonished to discover that high fructose corn syrup was an ingredient in my Rice Krispies! When did all of this happen? The fact is… I like to avoid ‘high fructose corn syrup’ and I will leave it to  the scientists to explain why.

It doesn’t take a genius to realize that if two rats given equal calories and the only difference is that the rat getting ‘high fructose corn syrup’ becomes obese… well, maybe that is what is really happening to us!

It’s becoming harder and harder to shop in the grocery store… time for ordinary folks to learn that cooking requires more than a microwave… unless you like those larger sizes.

Roger Freberg

looking for transparency at Cal Poly

00TransparencyAtCalPoly

I think it is only right to expect transparency from our public institutions. The fact that so many appear to be fighting disclosure only causes me to wonder what they don’t want us to see. At the forefront of concerns appears to be the many and varied ‘foundations’ associated with the California State University system that seem to have very little external control and virtually no public disclosure of their activities.

Here are two relevant articles that question how well our administrators are using the funds derived from the backs of students, parents, faculty and staff :

Chancellor hires 2 lobbyists without bids

excerpts:

At a time of state budget cuts, student tuition hikes, canceled classes, faculty hiring freezes and layoffs, CSU’s lobbyists have been paid to defeat bills designed to shed more light on CSU executive salaries and perks as well as public records. In 2006, The Chronicle reported that millions of dollars in extra compensation was quietly handed out to campus presidents and other top executives as they left their posts.

Trent Hager, chief of staff for Assemblyman Anthony Portantino, D-La Cañada Flintridge (Los Angeles County), said CSU paid the two lobbying firms in 2007 to derail his boss’ bill aimed at full disclosure of CSU salaries. “They got it sidetracked and killed,” he said.

But nearly $400,000 of those funds were paid to the two lobbying firms during months of the year when the firms performed no services for the CSU system regarding administrative or legislative actions, state records show.

Sonoma State University Betrays it’s Mission

excerpts:

A shocking betrayal of the public trust was revealed today by The Santa Rosa Press Democrat in an investigative report about the Sonoma State University Academic Foundation using donated funds to provide huge personal loans to cronies of foundation board members, some of which may never be recovered.

And what about Cal Poly?

Although the ‘giant black hole’  known as the Cal Poly Foundation has no observable event horizon, it is only one of four foundations on campus:

Associated Students, Incorporated of California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo
California Polytechnic State University Foundation
Cal Poly Corporation
Cal Poly Housing Corporation

The question I have is a simple one: should public institutions be lobbying to PREVENT full disclosure of how they do business? Should scarce educational resources in the hundreds of thousands and in the millions pass through the system to benefit a few without full disclosure?

The time to answer this question is now!

Roger Freberg


looking at the world honestly

00SloBoatToNowhere
First, be careful how much news you watch , all news is designed to be depressing because bad news sells. So I think it is best to limit your exposure , especially if you want to keep your sanity. I am also reminded of the ‘sales truism’ that all people can be motivated by fear and/or greed and we have a lot of that going around. So, the moral is “if you want to be manipulated less, don’t read too much news.”

However, there is a truth about our troubling economy. Our nation is in a period of transition. Unemployment has nearly doubled in my county this past year and we are supposed to be one of the ‘lucky’ counties in California with economic recovery slated for sometime in 2012; however, with major metropolitan areas like Los Angeles viewed darkly until ‘2014 or beyond’ the impact will be here for longer than most will accept.

Obviously, the real secret to staying ahead of the big challenges is to have a job… and the best jobs are those that are likely to be in demand even in tough times. Some young people fall in love with smaller communities and fool themselves into believing they can stay by holding multiple ‘joe jobs’, but having two or three jobs is meaningless if all of them are equally vulnerable to elimination. The young  need to go where the better jobs are. If I were to give unsolicited and unwanted advice to any young person, I would tell them:

1)  They need to get the better skills needed to help them compete in our new world. This means they need to look honestly at what type of education will have value in the future marketplace.

2) I would caution them that if they didn’t have a great job, the cost of a good party might be beyond their reach. 😉

3) Lastly, I would suggest they look at careers and parts of the county and the world to start their life that they might not have considered before.

4) The world still is for those who can adjust to change and have the courage to move forward whether at 20 or 70.

Look honestly at the world, then you’ll know what to do.

Roger